![]() |
Dr. Biodun Adedipe |
Adedipe
who stated this at the Peninscope programme in Lagos recently said, “Generally, the regulatory environment in financial services
in Nigeria is overlapping and fragmented, and therefore comes with several
inefficiencies and gaps in the extant laws, some of which are outdated and need
to be aligned with the present dynamics of economic activities in the country.”
Adedipe
said that the purpose of regulation is to facilitate commerce, prevent chaos
and ensure level-playing ground, adding, “In a
regulatory review study carried out in Nigeria in 2012/2013, there was evidence
suggesting that regulation is a hindrance to business activities and
investments in Nigeria.
“This is why the country ranks pretty low in the annual ‘Doing
Business’ survey conducted by the World Bank in conjunction with the
International Finance Corporation, (145th out of 190 countries in the 2018
ranking) – a score of 52.03 compared to 100 for frontier jurisdictions.
“The specific major findings of the study are that some of the
agencies had overlapping jurisdiction that often results in supremacy contests
between them, rather than collaboration and pursuit of common objective;
duplication of reporting and disparate demands by regulatory agencies has
adversely affected the cost of doing business and limited the scope for new
investments; high cost of compliance for regulated institutions; the regulators
themselves waste resources in conducting analysis of the same data, for example
such affinities exist between the CBN and NDIC as well as between the CAC and
FIRS. Many of the agencies have out-of-date extant laws that need to be
updated. The requisite tools, human capacity, appropriate technology and
supporting infrastructure were inadequate in a number of the agencies, thus
affecting their operations and their interface with the regulated institutions.”
Adedipe
said that some of the enabling laws of certain agencies do not provide
sufficient enforcement powers, which makes regulated institutions that commit
infractions get away with light or no sanctions at all. This was an issue with
NAICOM in 2013.
He
recommended that the governance structure and system in the agencies needs to
be strengthened to engender more transparency in their financial conduct even
as extant laws of regulatory bodies should be reviewed at regular intervals and
aligned with the current realities of the Nigerian business environment.
“Funding of the agencies should be given priority attention if they
must discharge their mandates effectively and efficiently. Corporate governance
needs to be strengthened in most agencies. Some regulatory bodies need their
enforcement powers to be strengthened,”
Adedipe said. (VANGUARD)
No comments:
Post a Comment