Chief Barrister Dr. Jimoh Ibrahim, CFR |
There is empirical evidence from the federating units to demonstrate an unfair distribution of income from the federation account. The interesting thing is that none of the federating units is happy with what they are getting, or indeed what they have ever received, from the federation account since Independence. Everyone is complaining!
Regional
leaders are suggesting restructuring that will allow for efficiency of the
power structure. To some, it is about rearrangement of the socio-political
system in such a way that will allow the states to have their autonomous
police.
The oil
producing states are asking questions about their future in the distribution of
income. They are demanding more projects and infrastructure. Interestingly,
they are demanding these things from the federal government, not from their own
state governments that are receiving cash from the federation account. What a
paradox!
None of
these questions are new. The only novelty is the actions, legitimate or
otherwise, that are now being used to drive the demand for answer. A national
conference where everyone comes together to brainstorm and find solutions to
these issues is key to preventing crises. But the present situation is almost
getting beyond what a conference can handle! Regrettably, a new government is
at the centre of this praxis of politics.
If these are
the silent political issues playing out at this time when we can wrongly assume
that all is well with the political system, what do we do? Is the federation on
a dangerous political lane? If yes, in whose interest?
It’s
difficult for me to share the view that Nigeria should restructure. In holding
this view, I am influenced by the circumstances of our coming together and our
present lack of proper reflection on emotional intelligence. Why are we killing
political tolerence? Are we no longer brothers and sisters? Do we realise that
the things that unite us outnumber those that separate us? Where is political
tolerance in all of these?
The main
victim of our federation is the Nigerian military, our brothers who took on the
uniform for ‘One Nigeria.’ They fought the war for us to have the peace! We
lost women, children and many of our citizens for the peace of Nigeria.
The
political class of yesterday held firm to the democratic kit of political
tolerance to secure one nation. God forbid otherwise! We stand to gain nothing
from war, for the victim of war is usually the innocent who is not actually the
target. The issues being raised are very important, but war cannot resolve
them. After war (God forbid!), we will still need to have meetings to fashion
out the way forward. Why don’t we increase the level of our political tolerance
to avert war?
We need
transformational change, not just mere unqualified change. Only
transformational change can usher in the Nigeria of our dreams; a new improved
Nigeria. Apologies to Martin Luther King, ‘I have a dream…’
If the APC
change is well conceptualised in transformational praxis, mobilisation is
imperative. In achieving this, eight things are urgently required. According to
John Kotter (1995), they are: establishing a sense of urgency, forming a
powerful guiding coalition, creating a vision, communicating the vision,
empowering others, planning for and creating short term wins, consolidating
improvement, producing more change and institutionalising new approaches.
Our
assessment of the performance of the current government will be based on the
capacity to deliver at least seven of these eight things. Until this is done,
no one should expect improved living conditions for Nigerians. The question is
how far the government can go in achieving these things. Only APC can answer
that question for now.
Our current
challenges cannot be the reason for our failure. Lao Tzu offers one very useful advice: “Knowing
others is intelligence; knowing yourself is true wisdom. Mastering others is
strength, mastering yourself is true power.” As we move on, one can only
hope leadership is no longer the challenge. Those who are going to prevent
conflict must be ready to manage the conflict of our existence.
Withers, B
(2007), Goodwin, C & Griffih (2007) have identified some of the things to
do: Create a safe and comfortable environment, Establish ground rules,
Encourage story-telling, Uncover underlying interests, Frame the issues for
common ground, among others. In my last presentation at the IMF training, I
summarised our dear country as “an emerging nation with the largest economy in
Africa (about one trillion dollars) and a GDP debt ratio of about 11%. The
country is 90% dependent on oil export. According to the United States Agency
for International Development, 138.6 million out of a total population of 186.4
million (2016) live on less than $2 a day. That translates into 94% of the
population living on less that $2 per day.”
My opinion
has always been that leadership is a journey and not a destination. The idea is
continuous improvement in our praxis of emotional intelligence, of our
self-awareness, self-regulations, motivation, empathy and social skills, all
enveloped in tolerance. (NationalMirror)
No comments:
Post a Comment