Tuesday 12 April 2022

TYPICAL HOUSING STANDARD IN OUR CLIMATE

The essence of Housing Standard to inform and deliver housing policy that reflects the latest understanding of the connections between housing conditions and health.
 
The Housing Standard is a living tool for property owners, elected officials, code agency staff, and all who are concerned about housing as a platform for health. Individually and together, the Standard constitutes minimum performance standards for a safe and healthy home.
 
It provides health-based measures to fill gaps where no property maintenance policy exists and also serves as a complement to the International Property Maintenance Code and other housing policies already in use by local and state governments and federal agencies.
 
The Standard bridges the health and building code communities by putting modern public health information into housing code parlance. The Standard is written in code language to ease its adoption, although we anticipate that localities will tailor it to local conditions.
 
Below is the housing standard:

 

THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF HOUSING

The physical structure of housing is an important part of the built environment. It encompasses both building materials and design, both of which can affect health. Examples of construction material impacts are: formaldehyde emissions from fibre-board materials; the release of asbestos from textured ceilings; and fibres from glass insulation material, which are all hazardous for human health. Particular designs create distinct problems of structural integrity, such as the apartments constructed from concrete, with inadequate steel reinforcing, in the former communist countries of Eastern Europe. Other design health effects include inadequate ventilation, and damp and mould.

 

INDOOR ENVIRONMENT

The indoor environment refers to the quality of air inside the dwelling which can be contaminated from a number of different sources, principally from building materials; side effects of heating; moulds and environmental tobacco smoke. In dwellings located besides busy roads and intersections, outdoor air contaminants from motor vehicle exhaust can pollute the indoors by being sucked in through windows or air conditioning systems. Contaminants from work and waste sites can be tramped inside on footwear. All these factors may influence the development of disease, through inhalation or ingestion. In some areas radon is also a major problem.

 

LEAD POISONING

Increased blood lead concentrations in children, which affect their kidneys, reproductive organs, nervous system, and cognitive functioning have been linked to the ingestion of flaking lead paint in poorly maintained housing. Lead contaminated water from lead pipes is the other main source of lead intake in older homes. Recognition and regulation have led to an abatement of this problem, so that blood lead concentrations in children have declined dramatically,22 although there are still areas where children are at high risk.

 

DAMP AND MOULD

Dampness in houses can be caused by the location of the house, structural defects in the house construction or maintenance, and the behaviour of the occupants, such as not airing the house by opening windows or using extractor fans during showering and cooking. Both subjective and objective measures of dampness in houses are used in research, and criteria are being established for evaluating observations in relation to exposure and adverse health effects, but it can be assumed that an estimate of the size of moisture damage is a reasonable surrogate for the exposure. Damp housing is clearly related to respiratory conditions in both adults and children.

 

Mould is more likely to grow in damp houses and is usually measured by the size of the visible mould patches, or the mass of active colonies. A mouldy smell is a good indication of mould activity. Mould and fungi have been shown to have a small, but significant respiratory effect on children. There is a dose-dependent risk increase of visible mould for respiratory infections, lower respiratory symptoms, and asthma.

 

COLD AND SEASONAL DIFFERENCES

The temperature of the indoor environment affects the health of occupants. The WHO recommends that indoor house temperatures be no lower than 18° and 20° for the very old and very young. There is strong evidence that there is a narrow comfort zone for humans with mortality rates lower on days in which the average temperatures range between 15° to 25° and rising progressively as the ambient temperature becomes hotter or colder. Below these moderate temperatures there is some evidence that cold is a risk factor in increasing asthma severity and COPD and may also delay recovery after discharge from hospital.

 

Seasonal differences in temperatures have a greater impact on avoidable mortality in winter in temperate countries than in colder countries, where houses are more thermally efficient and outdoor clothing is worn more systematically. In Great Britain, for example, it is estimated that 40 000 extra winter deaths occur each year because of housing and deprivation. In Great Britain an “inverse housing law” has been shown—those areas where climate is colder tend to be those where housing is worse. This maldistribution of good housing creates an additional environmental risk for those people living in colder areas for long periods of time and is associated with poorer respiratory health and diastolic hypertension. More equal socioeconomic development61 and the improvement of the thermal standards of housing have both been demonstrated to be effective preventative interventions to curb excess deaths.

 

HOUSEHOLD CROWDING

Crowding in households refers to the number of people per room and is measured in a number of different ways, from simple measures of the number of people per bedroom to measures, such as the Canadian Overcrowding Index, with underlying normative expectations of social standards.

 

Crowding has long been known to increase the risk of infectious diseases, such as meningoccocal disease,66 tuberculosis,67 and hepatitis B,68 but it also has an impact on mental health and seems to be a contributor at an ecological level to premature mortality.

 

NOISE POLLUTION

Excessive noise in overcrowded houses and from neighbouring houses and traffic is a common cause of sleep disruption, which can lead to impaired concentration and irritability.

 

MULTIPLE HOUSING DEPRIVATION

Multiple housing deprivation refers to the experience of poor housing over the course of a lifetime. Poor housing conditions in infancy, childhood, and adulthood such as overcrowding and damp, cold dwellings, have a cumulative detrimental effect on physical and mental health. Multiple housing deprivation seems to pose health risks of similar proportions to smoking and, on average, greater than that posed by excessive alcohol consumption.

 

Children seem to be particularly vulnerable to prolonged exposure to poor housing. A number of adult diseases, such as Helicobacter pylori, have been traced back to exposure to crowding in childhood. Associations between poorer housing conditions in childhood and mortality from common diseases in adulthood are not strong, but are distinguishable from other aspects of social and economic deprivation.

 

HOUSING CONDITION SURVEYS

A housing condition survey is a systematic survey of the physical condition of a dwelling, which identifies remediable hazards that otherwise have a negative impact on health and wellbeing. Houses are usually categorised according to fitness standards by environmental health officers or building inspectors so that local authorities can monitor and enforce regulatory standards to promote acceptable healthy housing. For example, the 1996 English House Condition Survey showed that that 1 522 000 UK dwellings did not meet the required fitness standards.

 

HOUSING TENURE

Tenure is the legal conditions under which people live in their dwellings. Homes can be rented or owner occupied. If they are rented they can be rented from a private or public landlord.

 

Those who own their own home, with or without a mortgage, are likely to be in better health than those who rent their house, either from private or public landlords. There is a strong relation between rental housing tenure and higher death rates even within social classes. Several British studies have shown more variation in mortality between owners and tenants within occupational social class groups than between social classes within tenure classes. These relations are also related to self perceived health, rates of long term illness, and general practitioner consultation rates.

 

While home ownership may generate a degree of security and control, particularly in countries where such behaviour is financially rewarded through tax assistance, it may not always be health promoting. Those households that fall behind on their mortgage payments may suffer increased insecurity and poorer mental health.

 

SOCIAL HOUSING

Social housing is subsidised public sector housing that is provided to tenants by local, state, or national governments or not for profit trusts. Housing is usually allocated according to a social allocation formula that takes account of the prospective tenants’ health and social circumstances. The rent may be determined as a proportion of the household income, in which case tenants are likely to have more disposable household income. Social housing can also be called affordable housing, council housing, or state housing. In some countries, housing subsidies are provided by welfare payments or vouchers as a way of offering those on low incomes greater choice of whether to rent privately or publicly, or become owner occupiers.

 

The expansion of social housing as part of state welfare policies was thought to have weakened the link between housing and health. However, area effects remain whereby even in the same city, there are “good” and “bad” estates. In the good estates the health of the tenants is measurably better. This may be the result of health selection, whereby the social allocation system filters people with poorer health into certain estates, or it may be that the reputation of certain areas means that people become less attached to these communities. This can lead to more residential mobility, which further weakens these areas’ social structures and organisations. The recent sale of better quality social housing under neo-liberal governments may have reduced fiscal burdens, but has led in some countries to a further concentration of tenants with low incomes and poorer health in identifiably socioeconomically deprived areas.

 

IMPACTS OF HOUSING ON MENTAL HEALTH

Housing has a moderately strong effect on the mental health of the occupants, particularly women, who through their child rearing roles spend more time at home on average than men. Some designs of housing such as high rise housing often cause undue problems for older people and women, carrying shopping and small children, and make it more difficult for parents to supervise their children playing outside. There is also a perception that high rise apartments are less safe from crime1and housing height is associated with decreased levels of mental health.

 

There is a demonstrated cumulative impact of poor housing on mental health. For example, women in damp housing are more likely than men to experience emotional upsets because of overcrowding leading to disturbed sleep and on-going frustration from attempts to get repairs made, or failing that, rehousing, and in the meantime to keep the dwelling clean.

 

HOUSING INTERVENTIONS

Insulating existing homes and providing effective safe heaters have been shown theoretically and in practice, to increase older people’s health and wellbeing and the health of children with asthma. In some cases the intervention prevented only further deterioration in health. The construction of new “passive” houses that are well insulated, have no active heating or cooling systems and use passive solar energy even in winter time, costs around 10% more but reduces energy running costs by a factor of 10 over the building lifetime. Such sustainable housing can increase the disposable income of the households and help to reduce inequalities.

 

Housing renewal is often carried out on sub-standard housing in socioeconomically deprived neighbourhoods, although it is likely to be less discriminating than selecting individual houses through housing condition surveys. Several before and after studies have shown that the mental health of tenants has improved after housing renewal or community regeneration, although some have reported adverse effects on general health after rehousing. Preliminary results of experimental relocation of families from areas of deprivation to improved housing in middle income areas have shown social and health gains and in another study, when the shift was to private housing, an improvement in mental health.

 

HOUSING NEIGHBOURHOODS

The social and physical characteristics of the area surrounding houses are important for maintaining the good health of the occupants. Following the evidence that improving housing alone is insufficient to greatly improve the health of occupants, the focus has shifted to the health of the community and the local geographical neighbourhood.

 

Neighbourhoods have a small but consistent impact on health status. Various omnibus measures of area based deprivation have been developed to rank the social and economic deprivation of neighbourhoods. Some are census based, some rely on municipal or school records.

 

Some are based on systematic videotapes of street life and have been used to develop concepts such as collective efficacy and structural constraints in order to explore different neighbourhoods’ shared expectations for the social control of public space. Systematic observational studies have also shown that both place and people, both the context and the composition of neighbourhoods, are important in determining health.

 

Multilevel analyses using area based measures, and increasingly using geo-coding, have shown that neighbourhood effects have a small, but significant impact on mortality and premature mortality, self reported health status, diseases such as gonorrhoea, as well as being risk factors for morbidity such as low birth weight. Aspects of neighbourhoods that have been identified as having an impact on health are: the presence or absence of local amenities, such as parks and sports facilities; “incivilities” such as the presence of graffiti, boarded up houses, garbage accumulation, abandoned cars and broken windows, and the signalling effect of these physical features that no one cares102; the perception of neighbourhoods as “safe” and under effective informal social controls; and the number of local organisations.

 

Others have postulated that neighbourhood conditions directly influence habits of privacy, child rearing, house keeping, and study, which can have an indirect effect on health.

 

HOUSING AND NEIGHBOURHOOD ATTACHMENT

Families who live for a long time in a particular house can be categorised as attached to their house and local community and contributing to residential stability. Neighbourhood attachment is likely to have benefits for the health of the family and the stability of the neighbourhood. Neighbourhood stability in childhood is associated with better self reported health in mid-life, but as this stability is linked to family stability, the effects are difficult to disentangle.

 

Residential stability refers to the social reproduction of neighbourhood residential structures, when typically population gains offset losses and home values appreciate. When longstanding families and households leave a neighbourhood, there is the possibility of destabilising social norms through the disruption of social networks. However, the destabilising effects of high levels of mobility are likely to have differential effects on different groups, depending on their social position and life stage and the material, social, and cultural resources from which they can draw. Many impoverished neighbourhoods have a high level of residential stability, yet poorer health. However, if the location, such as an inner city suburb becomes desirable and “gentrification” occurs, the in-migration of affluent households to poorer neighbourhoods can improve the health status of a neighbourhood simply through compositional changes.

 

Moving can be a normal part of family formation or a planned sign of upward mobility, but it can also reflect desperation and a downward spiral in health and welfare. This is one of the areas where qualitative research is able to illuminate the interaction between the increasing complexity of family life and residential mobility. The ability to move houses is related to the distribution of wealth and income in a population and the availability of social housing. Economic cycles and the local housing market are an integral part of this process.

 

FUTURE HOUSING RESEARCH DIRECTIONS

Houses and neighbourhoods are a very practical setting for public health action and by their nature combine both private and public interests. Housing studies are more likely to attract broad public, policy and political support than most other settings. Housing policy interventions provide opportunities for natural experimental studies that can provide some fruitful answers to the key public health question of how we can reduce social and economic determinants of health inequalities. However, current interventions are limited by their scope and their narrow definitions of housing and health. 

No comments:

Post a Comment