Justice Innocent Umezulike |
Justice Umezulike made this
call in view of the paralysis of judicial process and proceedings in jurisdictions
from where tribunal judges are drawn. According to him, constituting the trial
election tribunals with retired judicial officers has the advantage of
undivided attention, dedication to the exercise together with experience and
savvy.
He observed that the
current exercise where tribunal chairmen and members are drawn from among
serving judicial officers of superior courts has compounded the capacity of
jurisdictions where the judges are drawn; stressing that reviewing the system
could encourage honesty, courage and desire to leave a good legacy.
The Enugu Chief Judge spoke
during the opening of the 2015/2016 legal year ceremony. He underscored the importance
of having a strong and good Bar, stressing that the Bar and Bench must work
together to ensure a strong and effective administration of justice. He also
lamented the manner of appointment of judges in the judiciary, saying it has
often compromised the quality of justice at the courts.
While proffering solution
to the challenge, Justice Umezulike stated that from the next appointment
exercise of judicial officers of the state, he would recommend to the State
Judicial Service Commission the wholesale adoption of C.J Okoli’s guidelines,
which in 2005 in Anambra State, produced judges that could stand with all
judicial legends in Nigeria.
In his own words: “It is my desire to approximate the above approach so as to
strive to inaugurate a very strong and knowledgeable Bench where every judicial
officer is a Supreme Court material. The courtroom exposure and academic
publications inherent in the above guidelines will always produce a strong and
knowledgeable Bench.
“Notwithstanding
the National Judicial Council’s fundamental regulations which strictly bar
lobbying for the appointment of judges, some members of the Bar still lobby
menacingly for the job. I hereby plead that members of the Bar should
understand the manifest impossibility of accommodating all interested
contenders in the extremely limited chances allotted to the state judiciary.”
Given a breakdown of cases
at the three levels of courts in the state as at January to December last year,
he stated that a considerable number of the cases were either tried or
dispensed with, adding however that there was need for improved effort.
No comments:
Post a Comment